Coomes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence presented at the suppression hearing was insufficient to prove that the seizures were made pursuant to the plain view doctrine where the detective’s testimony failed to establish the circumstances surrounding the seizure of items in the house
• holding that the State timely challenged standing when it raised the issue during argument at the suppression hearing, before the court reached the Fourth Amendment merits and early enough for the defendant, if desired, to respond to the argument and/or present evidence on the point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).