Skip to main content

Almeida v. State

Citations

  • 748 So. 2d 922
  • 1999 WL 506965

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that death sentence was disproportionate where, after striking aggravator, defendant was left with a single aggravator and substantial mitigation including \a brutal childhood and vast mental health mitigation\
  • holding that death sentence was disproportionate where, after striking aggravator, defendant was left with a single aggravator and substantial mitigation including \a brutal childhood and vast mental health mitigation\
  • finding admission of irrelevant autopsy photo harmless \in light of the minor role the photo played in the State's case\
  • finding admission of irrelevant autopsy photo harmless \in light of the minor role the photo played in the State's case\
  • finding closing argument error harmless, in part, because the trial court instructed the jury that “what the lawyers say is neither evidence nor law”
  • finding closing argument error harmless, in part, because the trial court instructed the jury that what the lawyers say is neither evidence nor law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

65 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.