Supreme Court of Florida· 6/22/1989
State v. Smith
Citations
- 547 So. 2d 613
- 1989 WL 68818
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[s]ubsection 775.021(4)(b) is the specific, clear, and precise statement of legislative intent” that serves “as the controlling polestar” that guides double-jeopardy analysis
- explaining that when determining whether a case has been superseded by statute, courts must examine “the nature and effect of the court decisions and the statutory amendment”
- cannot have separate convictions for both sale and possession with intent to sell
- also denying retroactive application of the relevant statute as amended
- dual convictions for cocaine sale and possession upheld
- explaining the 1988 amendment changes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
207 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaforetSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-04-20· cited 201×
- Valdes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2009-01-30· cited 135×
- State v. McCloudSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-02-28· cited 109×
- Sirmons v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1994-02-03· cited 99×
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-02-22· cited 89×
- Donaldson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-04-30· cited 88×
- State v. WellerSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-11-07· cited 84×
- State v. PaulSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-06-22· cited 78×
- M.P. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-10· cited 76×
- Hayes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-11-21· cited 75×
- Boler v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-11· cited 73×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Florida· 1995-09-14· cited 72×
- Bates v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1999-10-07· cited 68×
- State v. GlennSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-02-15· cited 60×
- Lukehart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-09-28· cited 54×
- State v. FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2005-02-17· cited 54×
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-09-23· cited 52×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-13· cited 42×
- Capers v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-07-18· cited 40×
- Kayle Barrington Bates v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsEleventh Circuit· 2014-09-05· cited 40×
Cites
56 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court· 1982-02-24· cited 2,939×
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1983-11-01· cited 2,703×
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court· 1980-06-09· cited 2,564×
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1981-02-24· cited 2,482×
- Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court· 1983-01-19· cited 2,324×
- Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
- Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,316×
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-03-26· cited 1,092×
- Holly v. AuldSupreme Court of Florida· 1984-05-03· cited 735×
- Oscar Mayer & Co. v. EvansSupreme Court· 1979-05-21· cited 712×
- Glidden Co. v. ZdanokSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 689×
- Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 559×
- United States v. PriceSupreme Court· 1960-01-18· cited 552×
- Carawan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 474×
- Universities Research Assn., Inc. v. CoutuSupreme Court· 1981-04-06· cited 392×
- Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1983-05-31· cited 299×
- Federal Housing Administration v. Darlington, Inc.Supreme Court· 1959-01-12· cited 292×
- Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court· 1980-02-20· cited 235×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.