Barnett v. Redmond School District 2J

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying “principle that, when the nonmovant can show some specific factor that directly places the affiant’s credibility in jeopardy, that showing raises a fact issue sufficient to defeat summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• To v. State Farm Mutual Insurance
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-05-26· cited 36×
• Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1980-07-01· cited 34×
• West v. Allied Signal, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-06-15· cited 20×
• Downs v. Waremart, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-27· cited 17×
• Downs v. Waremart, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 13×
• Maduff Mortgage Corp. v. Deloitte Haskins & Sells
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1986-12-17· cited 11×
• Doughty v. Birkholtz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-09-09· cited 10×
• Bachmeier v. Tuttle
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-09-01· cited 10×
• Nixon v. Cascade Health Services, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-04-26· cited 10×
• AK Media Group, Inc. v. City of Portland
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-02-18· cited 2×