Skip to main content
· 9/9/1998

Doughty v. Birkholtz

Citations

  • 964 P.2d 1108
  • 156 Or. App. 89
  • 1998 Ore. App. LEXIS 1511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the two types of fraudulent transfers under Oregon’s uniform statute
  • under the lis pendens statute, “the subject of the suit must be an actual interest in real property”
  • “In the context of ORS 93.740 and in common par- lance, the term ‘suit’ refers to an action or process in court.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)
  • notice of lis pendens could not be based on a claim before the Construction Contractors Board, in part because the board is not “authorized to adjudicate or to affect interests in real property”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: De Muniz, Haselton, Linder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.