Bachmeier v. Tuttle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in reviewing the allowance of summary judgment, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, drawing all reasonable inferences in that party’s favor
• “[T]he fact that the attorney believed the claims to be without probable cause does not, without more, support a legally sufficient inference that the attorney acted for an improper purpose in doing so.”
• “[T]he fact that the attorney defendant prosecuted a prior action on a client’s behalf without probable cause cannot, by itself, support a legally sufficient inference that the attorney acted for an ‘improper purpose.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).