Downs v. Waremart, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the trial court’s denial of a motion to amend the complaint based on the age of the case and the fact that motion sought to introduce an entirely new theory into the case less than 30 days before trial
• where a plaintiff adduces evidence that places the credibility of the affiant at issue, the subjective belief of the affiant is not susceptible to summary judgment
• where a plaintiff adduces evidence that places the credibility of the affiant at issue, the subjective belief of the affiant is not susceptible to summary judgment
• trial court did not abuse discretion in denying leave to amend to add entirely new claim for wrongful discharge less than 30 days before trial date in two-year-old case
• “Given the age of the case and the proximity of the trial date, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).