Oregon Supreme Court· 10/31/1996
Downs v. Waremart, Inc.
Citations
- 926 P.2d 314
- 324 Or. 307
- 12 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 324
- 1996 Ore. LEXIS 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming the trial court’s denial of a motion to amend the complaint based on the age of the case and the fact that motion sought to introduce an entirely new theory into the case less than 30 days before trial
- where a plaintiff adduces evidence that places the credibility of the affiant at issue, the subjective belief of the affiant is not susceptible to summary judgment
- where a plaintiff adduces evidence that places the credibility of the affiant at issue, the subjective belief of the affiant is not susceptible to summary judgment
- trial court did not abuse discretion in denying leave to amend to add entirely new claim for wrongful discharge less than 30 days before trial date in two-year-old case
- “Given the age of the case and the proximity of the trial date, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying leave to amend.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Carson, Gillette, Van Hoomissen, Fadeley, Graber, Durham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- White v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Massachusetts, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2004-06-11· cited 93×
- Ramsey v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-08-04· cited 30×
- Safeport, Inc. v. Equipment Roundup & Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-11-06· cited 24×
- Perry v. ReinCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-09-26· cited 14×
- Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionOregon Supreme Court· 1999-04-08· cited 7×
- Kalgaard v. Lindo Mar Adventure Club, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-03-12· cited 7×
- Bradbury v. Teacher Standards & Practices CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-11-05· cited 4×
- Barnett v. Redmond School District 2JCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-12-13· cited 1×
- Eklof v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-11-18· cited 1×
- Shriners Hospitals for Children v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-01-23
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Churchey v. Adolph Coors Co.Supreme Court of Colorado· 1988-08-08· cited 302×
- SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. DoeTexas Supreme Court· 1995-07-21· cited 290×
- Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1986-07-03· cited 289×
- Yetterant v. Ward Trucking Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-01-18· cited 78×
- Layne v. Builders Plumbing Supply Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-03-27· cited 73×
- First State Bank of Corpus Christi v. AkeCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1980-06-12· cited 67×
- Wallulis v. DymowskiOregon Supreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 64×
- Grist v. Upjohn CompanyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1969-03-25· cited 52×
- Doe v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-07-07· cited 49×
- Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 42×
- Neighbors v. Kirksville College of Osteopathic MedicineMissouri Court of Appeals· 1985-06-11· cited 40×
- Farnsworth v. HydeOregon Supreme Court· 1973-08-02· cited 36×
- Belcher v. LittleSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-02-17· cited 35×
- Chasewood Construction Co. v. RicoTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1985-07-31· cited 28×
- State Ex Rel Advanced Dictating Supply, Inc. v. DaleOregon Supreme Court· 1974-08-01· cited 25×
- Merritt v. Detroit Memorial HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals· 1978-02-07· cited 23×
- Wieder v. Chemical BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1994-03-01· cited 18×
- Downs v. Waremart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-09-27· cited 17×
- Lee v. PaulsenOregon Supreme Court· 1975-09-09· cited 13×
- Andreason v. Guard Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court· 1971-10-20· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.