Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering the Thayer and Morgan theories and concluding that the causation presumption does not disappear with the introduction of opposing evidence by the employer
• considering the Thayer and Morgan theories and concluding that the causation presumption does not disappear with the introduction of opposing evidence by the employer
• presumption applied to claimant who suffered “both heart related and lung related conditions or impairments of the kind described in the statutes”
• describing two types of rebuttable presumptions
• describing operation of that statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1979-11-26· cited 6×
• Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1980-10-20· cited 3×
• Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-11-20· cited 1×
• Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund
  Ninth Circuit· 1977-01-27