Skip to main content
· 7/1/1980

Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Citations

  • 613 P.2d 755
  • 289 Or. 323
  • 1980 Ore. LEXIS 932

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the Thayer and Morgan theories and concluding that the causation presumption does not disappear with the introduction of opposing evidence by the employer
  • considering the Thayer and Morgan theories and concluding that the causation presumption does not disappear with the introduction of opposing evidence by the employer
  • presumption applied to claimant who suffered “both heart related and lung related conditions or impairments of the kind described in the statutes”
  • describing two types of rebuttable presumptions
  • describing operation of that statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Denecke, Howell, Lent, Peterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.