Skip to main content

Banks v. State

Citations

  • 46 So. 3d 989
  • 35 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 313
  • 2010 Fla. LEXIS 855
  • 2010 WL 2195718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • where trial witness said, unexpectedly, that she had “seen the tape of [the defendant] stabbing Mr. William Johnson,” but the stabbing of Mr. William Johnson was irrelevant to the trial
  • where trial witness said, unexpectedly, that she had “seen the tape of [the defendant] stabbing Mr. William Johnson,” but the stabbing of Mr. William Johnson was irrelevant to the trial
  • “Under the abuse of discretion standard of review, a ruling will be upheld unless the ruling is ‘arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, which is another way of saying that discretion is abused only where no reasonable person would take the view adopted by the trial court.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quince, Pariente, Lewis, Canady, Polston, Labarga, Perry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.