Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/24/1979
Bell v. State
Citations
- 582 S.W.2d 800
- 1979 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1300
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding voluntariness determination in case in which defendant was mildly mentally retarded and “lacked the capacity to read and understand certain statements”
- defendant was mildly 20 mentally retarded and lacked capacity to read a11d understand certain statements
- defendant was mildly 20 mentally retarded and lacked capacity to read and understand certain statements
- mildly retarded person who participated in a special education program was not incapable of waiving rights and making confession
- mildly retarded person who participated in a special education program was not incapable of waiving rights and making confession
- defendant was mildly mentally retarded and lacked capacity to read and understand certain statements
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tom G. Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
71 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Long v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-12-04· cited 804×
- Penry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-06-07· cited 713×
- Oursbourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2008-06-04· cited 626×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-11-19· cited 615×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-20· cited 561×
- Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-03-19· cited 373×
- Esquivel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-01-09· cited 256×
- Sanchez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1986-03-19· cited 197×
- McManus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-05· cited 193×
- Franks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-24· cited 191×
- Denison v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1983-05-04· cited 191×
- Combs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-12-08· cited 155×
- Harner v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 1999-06-23· cited 147×
- Banks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-11-03· cited 145×
- Beets v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1988-09-21· cited 143×
- Roy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1980-11-12· cited 126×
- Faulder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-09-30· cited 119×
- Mendoza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-23· cited 115×
- Eckert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-10-21· cited 93×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1987-04-08· cited 90×
Cites
59 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 6,121×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 5,066×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1959-06-15· cited 4,234×
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court· 1961-06-05· cited 3,697×
- Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1952-01-02· cited 3,286×
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court· 1966-06-06· cited 2,653×
- Jurek v. TexasSupreme Court· 1976-07-02· cited 2,034×
- Estes v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 1,725×
- Murphy v. FloridaSupreme Court· 1975-06-16· cited 1,568×
- Rideau v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1963-06-03· cited 1,211×
- Breithaupt v. AbramSupreme Court· 1957-02-25· cited 760×
- United States v. HaldemanD.C. Circuit· 1976-10-12· cited 661×
- Beck v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 596×
- Texas v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1975-12-01· cited 409×
- Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1954-03-15· cited 357×
- The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court· 1968-11-22· cited 276×
- Granviel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1976-11-10· cited 244×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.