Banks v. ASTURE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a written function-by-function analysis is not required
• ALJ’s failure to discuss claimant’s hypertension was harmless because it “is sufficiently controlled through treatment and medication, [and thus] cannot be considered disabling”
• when the ALJ “provided a thorough narrative discussion of [the claimant’s] limitations,” a function-by-function analysis was not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Cunningham v. Colvin
  District of Columbia· 2014-05-30· cited 32×
• Contreras v. Commissioner of Social Security
  District of Columbia· 2017-03-09· cited 26×
• Davis v. Berryhill
  District of Columbia· 2017-08-07· cited 25×
• Clark v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2011-02-25· cited 22×
• Ross v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2009-07-24· cited 21×
• Charles v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2012-04-11· cited 21×
• Jeffries v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2010-07-15· cited 18×
• Broyles v. Barnhart
  District of Columbia· 2012-12-18· cited 18×
• Hicks v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2010-06-16· cited 16×
• Cobb v. Astrue
  District of Columbia· 2011-03-17· cited 11×
• Rex v. Colvin
  D. Colorado· 2014-03-12· cited 6×
• Campfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
  District of Columbia· 2016-12-28· cited 4×
• Hicks v. Barnhart
  District of Columbia· 2010-06-16
• Ross v. Barnhart
  District of Columbia· 2009-07-24
• Johnson v. Colvin
  District of Columbia· 2017-07-03
• Ruppert v. Berryhill
  District of Columbia· 2020-01-13
• Matthews v. Berryhill
  District of Columbia· 2020-09-10
• Nsiah v. Berryhill
  District of Columbia· 2021-02-03
• Morgan v. Saul
  District of Columbia· 2021-09-03
• Mitchell v. Saul
  District of Columbia· 2021-11-15

Cites

35 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Richardson v. Perales
  Supreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
• Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
  Third Circuit· 2004-04-14· cited 1,381×
• Roberta Skinner v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner
  Seventh Circuit· 2007-03-07· cited 1,137×
• Joseph BURNS, Appellant v. Jo Anne B. BARNHART, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
  Third Circuit· 2002-12-04· cited 810×
• Myers v. Apfel
  Fifth Circuit· 2001-01-11· cited 239×
• Butler, Joan S. v. Barnhart, Jo Anne B.
  D.C. Circuit· 2004-01-13· cited 238×
• Claireather M. Wilkins v. Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
  Fourth Circuit· 1991-12-17· cited 216×
• Charles R. GROSS, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee
  Fourth Circuit· 1986-02-27· cited 210×
• Salazar v. Barnhart
  Tenth Circuit· 2006-10-05· cited 209×
• Edward Stewart v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States
  Third Circuit· 1983-08-10· cited 190×
• Sarah M. BOONE, Appellant v. Jo Anne BARNHART Commissioner of Social Security
  Third Circuit· 2004-02-19· cited 145×
• William S. McLaughlin v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare of the United States
  Second Circuit· 1980-01-10· cited 119×
• Lorraine Smith v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary, Department of Health & Human Services
  D.C. Circuit· 1987-08-25· cited 111×
• Roscoe Simms v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
  D.C. Circuit· 1989-06-27· cited 105×
• Lane-Rauth v. Barnhart
  District of Columbia· 2006-06-20· cited 94×
• Davis v. Heckler
  District of Columbia· 1983-06-24· cited 67×
• Delgado v. Commissioner of Social Security
  Sixth Circuit· 2002-03-04· cited 66×
• Raymond F. Diabo, Jr. v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare Two Cases
  D.C. Circuit· 1980-02-26· cited 62×
• Crosson v. Shalala
  District of Columbia· 1995-10-13· cited 38×
• William F. GARNETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee
  Fourth Circuit· 1990-06-12· cited 26×