Banks v. ASTURE

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a written function-by-function analysis is not required
• ALJ’s failure to discuss claimant’s hypertension was harmless because it “is sufficiently controlled through treatment and medication, [and thus] cannot be considered disabling”
• when the ALJ “provided a thorough narrative discussion of [the claimant’s] limitations,” a function-by-function analysis was not required

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).