Cobb v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the ALJ’s RFC insufficient where the assessment of opinions contained only broad generalizations rather than analysis and citation to specific facts
• holding the ALJ’s RFC insufficient where the assessment of medical opinions contained only broad generalizations rather than analysis and citation to specific facts
• finding reversible error where, among other things, the RFC assessment “impede[d] effective judicial review”
• reversing ALJ’s “extremely generic and abstract” declaration that plaintiff could perform “light work”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).