Evon HUDSON, Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, while ALJs may pose multiple hypotheticals, they need only credit those that are consistent with the evidence of record
• holding that, while ALJs may pose multiple hypotheticals, they need only credit those that are consistent with the evidence of record
• holding that an ALJ’s decision must be “read as a whole”
• explaining that the ALJ does not need “to use particular language or adhere to a particular format in conducting his analysis”
• noting that the ALJ is not required to “use particular language or adhere to a particular format in conducting his analysis”
• explaining that an ALJ need only sufficiently explain her findings to permit meaningful review, without using particular language or adhering to a particular format

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).