Cunningham v. Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that it is the plaintiff's burden to show a lack of substantial evidence
• noting that where the ALJ finds that the claimant suffers from an impairment that meets one of those listed, then, the claimant qualifies as disabled, ending the inquiry at step three
• holding that courts may not reweigh the evidence
• noting that “the Court’s review of the record shows that the findings and analysis in the ALJ’s residual functional assessment involved a sufficient discussion of the relevant evidence, including which was credited and which was rejected”
• discussing opinion “dated during a period where the claimant was working at substantial gainful activity”
• “the ALJ ‘buil[t] a logical bridge from the evidence to his conclusion,’ by thoroughly evaluating the evidence, explaining which evidence was persuasive and supported by the record, and comparing the objective medical evidence to Plaintiff’s subjective testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).