Fifth Circuit· 1/11/2001

Myers v. Apfel

Citations

238 F.3d 617
2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 388
2001 WL 28539

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

remanding where ALJ failed to provide specific assessment of applicant’s capacity to stand, walk, push, or pull despite conflicting medical evidence about those functions
remanding where “the ALJ failed to resolve the inconsistencies in the evidence” regarding claimant's residual functional capacity
remanding where ALJ failed to provide specific assessment of applicant’s capacity to stand, walk, push, or pull despite conflicting medical evidence about those functions
remanding case where “the ALJ failed to consider the evidence carefully” and selectively cited evidence
remanding where the ALJ failed to provide a specific assessment of the applicant’s capacity to stand, walk, push, or pull despite conflicting medical evidence about those functions
pointing out SSR 96-8p and 96-9p require an ALJ to perform a “function-by- function assessment” of the claimant’s capacity to perform sustained work-related physical, mental, and other work activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garza, Stewart, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.