Myers v. Apfel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding where ALJ failed to provide specific assessment of applicant’s capacity to stand, walk, push, or pull despite conflicting medical evidence about those functions
• remanding where “the ALJ failed to resolve the inconsistencies in the evidence” regarding claimant's residual functional capacity
• remanding where ALJ failed to provide specific assessment of applicant’s capacity to stand, walk, push, or pull despite conflicting medical evidence about those functions
• remanding case where “the ALJ failed to consider the evidence carefully” and selectively cited evidence
• remanding where the ALJ failed to provide a specific assessment of the applicant’s capacity to stand, walk, push, or pull despite conflicting medical evidence about those functions
• pointing out SSR 96-8p and 96-9p require an ALJ to perform a “function-by- function assessment” of the claimant’s capacity to perform sustained work-related physical, mental, and other work activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).