Broyles v. Barnhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that three positions with an SVP of 2 were considered unskilled positions and consistent with the ALJ’s findings about the plaintiff’s mental limitations
• finding an ALJ’s analysis sufficient because the ALJ clearly explained how he weighed certain evidence
• ALJ’s consideration of contradictory evidence sufficient because the ALJ explained why such evidence conflicted with other medical evidence
• “[I]n determining whether there are jobs which exist in significant numbers in the national economy that a claimant can perform[,] ... an ALJ may consider the testimony of a vocational expert.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).