Skip to main content
First Circuit· 6/22/2006

Baena v. KPMG LLP

Citations

  • 453 F.3d 1
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 15577
  • 46 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 188
  • 2006 WL 1703822

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the doctrine is, on occasion, “dubiously” referred to as implicating standing
  • applying in pari delicto where company's managers used the company to commit wrongdoing
  • applying in pari delicto where company’s managers used the company to commit wrongdoing
  • “imputation maybe avoided where the wrongdoing is done primarily for personal benefit of the officer and is ‘adverse’ to the interest of the company”
  • trustee's case barred by in pari delicto, but that doctrine \has nothing to do with Article III requirements\
  • listing looting as a “classic example” of adverse conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

49 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Baena v. KPMG LLP

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.