Nevada Supreme Court· 5/12/2011

Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Dodds

Citations

127 Nev. 196
252 P.3d 681
127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 17
2011 Nev. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “we decline to address an issue raised for the first time on appeal”
providing that dismissal based on the expiration of a statute of limitations is appropriate when the complaint demonstrates the claim's untimeliness
explaining that this court will generally decline to consider issues not raised by the parties
providing that dismissal based on the expiration of a statute of limitations is appropriate when the complaint demonstrates the claim's untimeliness
explaining that arguments not addressed in appellate briefmg, are not properly before this court
denying a similar unsubstantiated request that a matter be assigned to a different judge upon remand because the district court “prejudged” the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Douglas, Gibbons, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Pickering, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

63 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.