Skip to main content

Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Dodds

Citations

  • 127 Nev. 196
  • 252 P.3d 681
  • 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 17
  • 2011 Nev. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “we decline to address an issue raised for the first time on appeal”
  • providing that dismissal based on the expiration of a statute of limitations is appropriate when the complaint demonstrates the claim's untimeliness
  • explaining that this court will generally decline to consider issues not raised by the parties
  • providing that dismissal based on the expiration of a statute of limitations is appropriate when the complaint demonstrates the claim's untimeliness
  • explaining that arguments not addressed in appellate briefmg, are not properly before this court
  • denying a similar unsubstantiated request that a matter be assigned to a different judge upon remand because the district court “prejudged” the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Douglas, Gibbons, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Pickering, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.