Nevada Supreme Court· 5/12/2011
Glenbrook Capital Ltd. Partnership v. Dodds
Citations
- 127 Nev. 196
- 252 P.3d 681
- 127 Nev. Adv. Rep. 17
- 2011 Nev. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “we decline to address an issue raised for the first time on appeal”
- providing that dismissal based on the expiration of a statute of limitations is appropriate when the complaint demonstrates the claim's untimeliness
- explaining that this court will generally decline to consider issues not raised by the parties
- providing that dismissal based on the expiration of a statute of limitations is appropriate when the complaint demonstrates the claim's untimeliness
- explaining that arguments not addressed in appellate briefmg, are not properly before this court
- denying a similar unsubstantiated request that a matter be assigned to a different judge upon remand because the district court “prejudged” the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cherry, Douglas, Gibbons, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Pickering, Saitta
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.