McBee v. Delica Co., Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the limits on judicial exercises of personal jurisdiction are waivable personal rights rooted in the due process clause
• noting that “subject matter jurisdiction . . . which goes to the fundamental institutional competence of the court . . . can be raised sua sponte at any time”
• discussing appropriateness of bypassing jurisdictional question where Article III jurisdiction is not in doubt and merits claim clearly fails
• exercising personal jurisdiction on the mere existence of a website “would ‘eviscerate’ the limits of state’s jurisdiction over out-of-state or foreign defendants”
• describing a false endorsement claim by a \well-known American jazz musician\ against a Japanese clothing company and affirming dismissal on jurisdictional and standing grounds
• citing, in dicta, United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Angus Chem. Co., 322 F.3d 942, 945-51 (7th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (whether the Sherman Act applied extraterritorially under FTAIA went to subject matter jurisdiction of court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).