Specialty National Insurance v. OneBeacon Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that auto exclusion applied, despite assertion that underlying complaint sought damages “solely on a theory” of failure to place requisite warning signs on roadway, when source of injuries was placement (i.e., use) of vehicle
• “The expression ‘arising out of’ . . . does not refer to all circumstances in which the injury would not have occurred ‘but for’ [the covered conduct].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).