In Re Amerco Derivative Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that dismissal based on the expiration of a statute of limitations is appropriate when the complaint demonstrates the claim's untimeliness
• stating that, under Nevada law, “[t]he statute of limitation for an unjust enrichment claim is four years” (citing NEV. REV. STAT. § 11.190(2)(c))
• applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty
• applying the three-year statute of limitations for fraud to an analogous claim for breach of fiduciary duty
• determining the plaintiff stated a claim by alleging it had “customers who would have 6 rented self-storage units in [its] U-Haul facilities” but for the defendants’ interference
• majority of board lacked “disinterestedness and independence,” with board “not asked to consider the [relevant] transactions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).