Skip to main content
S.D. New York· 2/13/1990

Azurite Corp. Ltd. v. Amster & Co.

Citations

  • 730 F. Supp. 571
  • 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1560
  • 1990 WL 12306

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, aside from the fraud itself, the elements of a RICO charge need not be pleaded with particularity
  • stating that, aside from the fraud itself, the elements of a RICO charge need not be pleaded with particularity
  • allegations of various acts of mail and wire fraud over 7 month period, without more, insufficient to establish continuity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Leisure

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.