Center Cadillac, Inc. v. Bank Leumi Trust Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiffs’ allegations that defendant repeatedly refused to provide plaintiffs with bank statements disclosing the amount of interest charged failed to allege fraudulent concealment and that such refusals should have further caused plaintiffs to suspect fraud
• association enterprise sufficiently alleged where plaintiffs claimed individual defendants functioned as a unit with a banking entity to perpetrate fraud and extortion on plaintiffs
• “Where the employer allegedly benefits from the predicate acts, respondeat superior liability under RICO is appropriate.”
• “Rule 9(b) is satisfied if the complaint gives enough information to enable defendants to frame a responsive pleading and assures a sufficient basis exists for the allegations made.”
• “Where the employer allegedly benefits from the predicate acts, respondeat superior liability under RICO is appropriate.”
• “Even if Plaintiffs may have difficulty proving these allegations, it would be premature to dismiss these claims at . . . [the motion to dismiss] stage of the proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).