B v. Optische Industrie De Oude Delft v. Hologic, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting plaintiffs allegation that “chest equalization radiography” was relevant market because plaintiff had not addressed “any reasonably interchangeable alternatives”
• no open-ended continuity where no allegation that “coercive litigation is a regular aspect of Defendants’ business, or that there is a likelihood of repetition of these alleged predicate acts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).