Missouri Court of Appeals· 1/25/2011

State v. Pickens

Citations

332 S.W.3d 303
2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 59
2011 WL 208367

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

reiterating that Frye is used to determine the admissibility of scientific evidence in criminal cases
noting that “[t]he jury must still resolve what weight it will accord” the testimony
An expert may not intrude upon the jury’s right to draw inferences and conclusions from the facts of the case.”
a party cannot complain on appeal about a procedure adopted in the trial court at his or her own request, nor may an appellant complain of alleged error, which by such person’s conduct at trial, he or she joined in or acquiesced or invited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lawrence E. Mooney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.