Skip to main content
· 3/7/1994

Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Blosenski

Citations

  • 847 F. Supp. 1261
  • 24 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21125
  • 38 ERC (BNA) 1786
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2540
  • 1994 WL 91236

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing as “primary assets,” among other things, “goodwill and customer lists”
  • continuity found when seller’s creditors instructed that purchaser would be liable for debts
  • purchaser of assets of waste haul business liable as successor
  • rejecting Atlas’s additional requirement and fully adopting expansion
  • listing the factors in the substantial continuity test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Giles

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.