United States v. Anthony J. Pisani, M.D.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that federal veil-piercing standards are appropriate in Medicare disputes due to the need for a uniform federal approach
• holding that the presence of some of the factors “can be sufficient to show . . . unfairness”
• holding that the presence of some of the factors “can be sufficient to show . . . unfairness”
• noting that one of the objectives of Medicare is to provide “prompt reimbursements to providers” for the purpose of encouraging providers “to treat Medicare patients”
• affirming piercing of the corporate veil when the shareholder “repaid the [shareholder] loans to himself with corporate funds while the corporation was failing”
• crafting a federal common law alter ego test for determining personal liability under the federal Medicare statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).