· 11/1/1994
State of NY v. N. Storonske Cooperage Co., Inc.
Citations
- 174 B.R. 366
- 39 ERC (BNA) 2038
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16148
- 1994 WL 631224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- refraining from deciding which law applies to federal claims because state and federal rules are parallel
- “Summary judgment on a fraud claim of any kind is exceedingly rare due to the intent element, which, is almost always an issue of fact.”
- applying a mixture of state and traditional norms
- applying a mixture of state and traditional norms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCURN
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.