Skip to main content
· 11/1/1994

State of NY v. N. Storonske Cooperage Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 174 B.R. 366
  • 39 ERC (BNA) 2038
  • 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16148
  • 1994 WL 631224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refraining from deciding which law applies to federal claims because state and federal rules are parallel
  • “Summary judgment on a fraud claim of any kind is exceedingly rare due to the intent element, which, is almost always an issue of fact.”
  • applying a mixture of state and traditional norms
  • applying a mixture of state and traditional norms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCURN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.