United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deciding that \[f]ederal law therefore controls\ the dispute but concluding that state law gives \content to this federal rule\
• deciding that “[federal law therefore controls” the dispute but concluding that state law gives “content to this federal rule”
• holding that federal law governs questions involving the rights of the United States arising under nationwide federal programs
• holding that a national rule is not needed to determine the priority of liens arising from federal lending programs
• holding that a national rule is not needed to determine the priority of liens arising from federal lending programs
• holding that the priority of liens stemming from federal lending programs is a matter of federal common law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).