Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland Apartments

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that a ‘disposal’ may occur when a party disperses contaminated soil during the course of grading and filling a construction site”
• holding general partners escape liability through the third party defense because their partnership interest did not put them in a contractual relationship with the release-causing parties.
• refusing to consider claims or arguments not fairly presented to' the district court in summary judgment proceedings
• noting possibility of liability exists when partners, by virtue of their status as partners in a partnership, are liable indirectly for the partnership’s liability
• defining a “genuine” issue of fact within the meaning of the summary judgment standard in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c)
• affirming the district court's finding that the defendant could not be held liable for the alleged disposal of FIFRA-registered pesticides because plaintiff failed to produce \any evidence refuting [the defendant's] proof that [the] pesticides were properly applied. \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).