United States v. Carolina Transformer Company Dewey Strother Kenneth Ray Strother Faytranco, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• identifying relevant factors as “(1) retention of the same employees; (2) retention of the same supervisory personnel; (3) retention of the same production facilities in the same location; (4) production of the same product; (5) retention of the same name; (6) continuity of assets; (7
• “Against the background of Carolina Transformer’s emerging environmental problems[,]” former director and employee formed successor corporation
• “On summary judgment, we must draw all justifiable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party, including questions of credibility and of the weight to be accorded particular evidence.”
• the continuity of stock, shareholders and directors is determinative
• citingAnderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 255 (1986)
• applying the mere continuation test under federal common law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).