Skip to main content
· 1/21/1999

Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Justus (In Re Kaypro)

Citations

  • 230 B.R. 400
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 1517
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1166
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 111
  • 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1133

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[TJhere is no generally accepted accounting principle method for analyzing the insolvency of a company.... Although such principles are relevant, they are not controlling in insolvency determinations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riblet, Jones, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.