Ninth Circuit· 1/21/1999
Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Justus (In Re Kaypro)
Citations
- 230 B.R. 400
- 99 Daily Journal DAR 1517
- 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1166
- 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 111
- 33 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1133
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[TJhere is no generally accepted accounting principle method for analyzing the insolvency of a company.... Although such principles are relevant, they are not controlling in insolvency determinations”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riblet, Jones, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 2000-07-13· cited 147×
- Lids Corp. v. Marathon Investment Partners, L.P. (In Re Lids Corp.)D. Delaware· 2002-08-06· cited 23×
- Brandt v. nVidia Corp. (In Re 3dfx Interactive, Inc.)N.D. California· 2008-04-30· cited 12×
- Diamond Power International, Inc. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (In Re Babcock & Wilcox Co.)E.D. Louisiana· 2002-02-08· cited 9×
- Mendelsohn v. Sequa Financial Corp. (In Re Frank Santora Equipment Corp.)E.D. New York· 1999-03-23· cited 6×
- Ganis Credit Corp. v. Anderson (In re Jan Weilert R.V., Inc.)Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-24· cited 2×
- Diamond v. Gemmel Pharmacy Group, Inc. (In Re Inland Global Medical Group, Inc.)C.D. California· 2006-04-04· cited 1×
- Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. JustusNinth Circuit· 2000-07-13· cited 1×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1993-09-24· cited 1,108×
- In Re Roblin Industries, Inc., Debtor. William E. Lawson, Trustee, in Bankruptcy of Roblin Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySecond Circuit· 1996-02-26· cited 205×
- In Re Byron C. Lewis Irene Lewis, Debtors. Byron C. Lewis Irene Lewis v. Mitchell R. ScottNinth Circuit· 1996-10-02· cited 176×
- Joseph Long v. Vera Simmons, Lt.Fifth Circuit· 1996-03-20· cited 173×
- In Re Fred Hawes Organization, Inc., Debtor. William B. Logan, Trustee v. Basic Distribution CorporationSixth Circuit· 1992-04-10· cited 131×
- Brandt v. Repco Printers & Lithographics, Inc. (In Re Healthco International, Inc.)First Circuit· 1997-12-22· cited 128×
- In the Matter of J.P. Fyfe, Inc. Of Florida v. Bradco Supply CorporationThird Circuit· 1989-12-08· cited 128×
- Sheet Metal Workers' International Association Local Union No. 359 v. Madison Industries, Inc., of ArizonaNinth Circuit· 1996-05-29· cited 110×
- In Re Yurika Foods Corp., Debtor and Debtor-In-Possession. Yurika Foods Corporation v. United Parcel ServiceSixth Circuit· 1989-10-23· cited 103×
- Jodoin v. Samayoa (In Re Jodoin)Ninth Circuit· 1997-05-02· cited 94×
- In Re Magic Circle Energy Corp.W.D. Oklahoma· 1986-08-19· cited 82×
- United States Ex Rel. Farmers Home Administration v. Arnold & Baker Farms (In Re Arnold & Baker Farms)Ninth Circuit· 1994-12-30· cited 77×
- Sierra Steel, Inc. v. Totten Tubes, Inc. (In Re Sierra Steel, Inc.)Ninth Circuit· 1989-02-06· cited 74×
- In Re Carled, Inc., Debtor. Frederick M. Luper, Trustee v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Sixth Circuit· 1996-08-02· cited 62×
- In the Matter of Midway Airlines, Incorporated, Debtor. Appeal of Jensen Cabinet, IncorporatedSeventh Circuit· 1995-11-02· cited 60×
- Surabhan Ratanasen v. State of California, Department of Health ServicesNinth Circuit· 1993-12-15· cited 49×
- Ford v. Union Bank (In re San Joaquin Roast Beef)Ninth Circuit· 1993-10-20· cited 40×
- In Re Demetrius Koubourlis Toni J. Koubourlis, Debtors. Robert William Akers v. Demetrius Koubourlis Toni J. KoubourlisNinth Circuit· 1989-03-13· cited 37×
- Richardson v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Richardson)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-11-21· cited 30×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1998-01-14· cited 26×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.