In Re Carled, Inc., Debtor. Frederick M. Luper, Trustee v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that creditor offered evidence that twenty-four percent of the customers of another gas utility company were at least thirty days past due on their accounts and it was ordinary for commercial customers to fall into that category
• noting that creditor offered evidence that twenty-four percent of the customers of another gas utility company were at least thirty days past due on their accounts and it was ordinary for commercial customers to fall into that category
• Sixth Circuit holding that \`ordinary business terms' means that the transaction was not so unusual as to render it an aberration in the relevant industry\
• Sixth Circuit holding that “ ‘ordinary business terms’ means that the transaction was not so unusual as to render it an aberration in the relevant industry”
• “Although the factual underpinnings of the bankruptcy court’s decision must be upheld unless clearly erroneous, the application of the legal standard to the facts is a question of law that we review de novo.”
• “Columbia presented evidence about the difficulty of obtaining information from other utility companies ... relating collection deficiencies because such information is not generally known or disseminated and is considered proprietary.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).