Skip to main content
· 9/24/1993

Federal Case

Citations

  • 5 F.3d 1255
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 12208
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7148
  • 26 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1428
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 24540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming denial of motion for 15 reconsideration because the relevant evidence “and the process by which their 16 relationship to the Preston affidavits could have been established, had been available 17 to the School District from the beginning of the case.”
  • “the failure to file 11 documents in an original motion … does not turn the late filed documents into ‘newly 12 discovered evidence’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.