Skip to main content
· 2/26/1996

In Re Roblin Industries, Inc., Debtor. William E. Lawson, Trustee, in Bankruptcy of Roblin Industries, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company

Citations

  • 78 F.3d 30
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 3138
  • 28 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • emphasizing that in order to assert the ordinary course of business defense, the creditor bears the burden of proving each of the three elements outlined in the statute
  • finding that \the behavior of the parties cannot be sufficient in and of itself to sustain the creditor's burden of proof with respect to ordinary business terms in the industry\
  • noting that, although book values “are, in some circumstances, competent evidence from which inferences about a debtor’s insolvency may be drawn,” such values “are not ordinarily an accurate reflection of the market value of an asset”
  • opining that appraisal is the better approach to determine fair valuation
  • stating that if possible, insolvency determinations should be based on seasonable appraisals or expert testimony, but that “[b]ecause the value of property varies with time and circumstances, the finder of fact must be free to arrive at the ‘fair valuation’ defined in § 101[(32
  • stating, in a case involving the valuation of a business at the time of a preferential transfer, that a determination of insolvency under the Bankruptcy Code should be based on expert testimony \whenever possible\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLaughlin, Leval, Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.