Brandt v. Repco Printers & Lithographics, Inc. (In Re Healthco International, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the panel should “exhibit no particular deference to the conclusions of ... the district court”
• holding that the panel should \exhibit no particular deference to the conclusions of . . . the district court\
• noting significance of difference in collection attempts made by creditor prior to preference period and during preference period
• “This familiar standard is not diluted merely because parties proceed on a stipulated record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).