Brandt v. nVidia Corp. (In Re 3dfx Interactive, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• comparing 11 U.S.C.A. § 548 and Cal. Civ. Code § 3439
• “[I]f it is necessary for a just result, the court may construe a segmented transaction as one constructive fraud analysis. Eurolux did not raise that argument in the district court, so it is waived. See United States v. Robertson, 52 F.3d 789, 791 (9th Cir. 1994

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).