Arnold v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s error in admitting DNA evidence at trial without giving the defendant an opportunity to present conflicting evidence constituted a violation of his due process rights, was not harmless, and required the reversal of the defendant’s conviction
• trial court's error in admitting DNA evidence at trial without giving the defendant an opportunity to present conflicting evidence constituted a violation of his due process rights, was not harmless, and required the reversal of the defendant's conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zack v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-07-07· cited 103×
• Special v. Baux
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-16· cited 28×
• Holy Cross Hosp., Inc. v. Marrone
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-17· cited 11×
• Perdomo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-10-09· cited 7×
• Collier v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-15· cited 7×
• Pickel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-12· cited 3×
• Roberts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-03-12· cited 2×
• Picked v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-08-12· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Apprendi v. New Jersey
  Supreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
• Frye v. United States
  D.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
• State v. DiGuilio
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1986-07-17· cited 2,703×
• Brim v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-01-16· cited 113×
• Hadden v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-02-06· cited 113×
• Murray v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1997-04-17· cited 86×
• Ramirez v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-01-05· cited 72×
• Hayes v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1995-06-22· cited 70×