Skip to main content

Arnold v. State

Citations

  • 610 P.2d 1210
  • 94 N.M. 381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a court must ascertain and give effect to the intention of the legislature in construing a statute
  • decided under previous law which limited consent to the sender of the communication under Section 31-12-1(0 and did not contain an exception for investigation of crime with consent of one of the parties to the communication comparable to Section 31-12-1(3)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Federici, Sosa, Kaufman, Easley, Payne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.