Skip to main content

Arnold v. State

Citations

  • 566 So. 2d 37
  • 1990 WL 121787

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the habitual offender statute does not unconstitutionally shift the burden of proof to the defendant even though the statute no longer requires a finding of necessity for protection of the public

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patterson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.