Arnold v. McFall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denying “long- term disability benefits cannot be reasonably characterized as an abuse of discretion merely because short-term disability benefits had previously been awarded.”
• noting that plan administrator sought additional information through written questions to the claimant’s cardiologist
• letter satisfied regulatory obligations because it provided claimant with enough information to facilitate a meaningful appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).