Christopher v. Harbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to state an 18 access to courts violation, plaintiff must describe the non-frivolous nature of the “underlying 19 cause of action, whether anticipated or lost”
• “[T]he complaint should state 12 the underlying claim in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a), just as if it were 13 being independently pursued, and a like plain statement should describe any remedy available 14 under the access claim and presently unique to it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).