Skip to main content
· 7/16/2002

Richard A. Brough, Jr. v. Imperial Sterling Ltd.

Citations

  • 297 F.3d 1172
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 319
  • 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1735
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14324
  • 2002 WL 1558398

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The jury could only award Brough damages by speculating that [the defendant] would leave the properties on the market and ac- cept offers from buyers.”
  • “[D]amages may not be awarded for lost profits when those profits are dependent on a party taking an action that it is unclear he would have taken.”
  • “The 11 general rule is that, during trial, ‘no reference should be made to the wealth or poverty of a party, 12 nor should the financial status of one party be contrasted with the other’s.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marcus, Kravitch, Vinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.