· 7/16/2002
Richard A. Brough, Jr. v. Imperial Sterling Ltd.
Citations
- 297 F.3d 1172
- 60 Fed. R. Serv. 319
- 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1735
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 14324
- 2002 WL 1558398
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The jury could only award Brough damages by speculating that [the defendant] would leave the properties on the market and ac- cept offers from buyers.”
- “[D]amages may not be awarded for lost profits when those profits are dependent on a party taking an action that it is unclear he would have taken.”
- “The 11 general rule is that, during trial, ‘no reference should be made to the wealth or poverty of a party, 12 nor should the financial status of one party be contrasted with the other’s.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marcus, Kravitch, Vinson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.