Skip to main content
· 4/6/2000

People v. Waidla

Citations

  • 996 P.2d 46
  • 94 Cal. Rptr. 2d 396
  • 22 Cal. 4th 690
  • 22 Cal. 690
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 3605
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2687
  • 2000 Cal. LEXIS 2229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “ ‘It is, of course, “the general rule” ’—which we find applicable here—‘ “that questions relating to the admissibility of evidence will not be reviewed on appeal in the absence of a specific and timely objection in the trial court on the ground sought to be urged on appeal” ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mosk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.