Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Foote

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, testimony that accelerant detection canine is more reliable than laboratory equipment is without scientific validity
• holding that testimony that accelerant detection canine is more reliable than laboratory equipment is without scientific validity
• testimony that accelerant detection canine is more reliable than laboratory equipment is without scientific validity
• no error in refusing to inquire further into alleged jury misconduct when there was no affirmative proof that the jurors had been discussing the case, and when such an inquiry might have only served to place undue emphasis on the challenged conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).