Anderson-Bey v. Zavaras

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting “Defendant’s challenge to the affirmance of his conviction [because it was] in essence a challenge to the Colorado Court of Appeals’ interpretation of the state robbery statute, a challenge that we cannot entertain in a proceeding under § 2254”
• “Even if we believe that the state courts misinterpreted state law in upholding a defendant’s convictions, ‘it is not the province of a federal habeas court to reexamine state-court determinations on state-law questions.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).