Seventh Circuit· 7/2/2014
Mark Suesz v. Med-1 Solutions, LLC
Citations
- 757 F.3d 636
- 2014 WL 2964771
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “adopting a new rule while refusing to apply it to the parties before us would raise serious constitutional concerns”
- debt collector violates § 1692e by \suing a debtor after the statute of limitations has expired\
- prospective overruling permissible where “the law has been so well settled before the overruling that it had been unquestionably prudent for the community to rely on the previous legal understanding”
- \[A] prior decision of one intermediate appellate court does not create the degree of certainty concerning an issue of federal law that would justify reliance so complete as to justify applying a decision only prospectively in order to protect settled expectations.\
- “a prior decision of one intermediate appellate court does not create the degree of certainty concerning an issue of federal law that would justify reliance so complete as to justify applying a decision only prospectively in order to protect settled expectations”
- “[O]ne common tactic for debt collectors is to sue in a court that is not convenient to the debtor, as this makes default more likely; or in a court perceived to be friendly to such claims; or, ideally, in a court having both of these characteristics.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wood, Posner, Flaum, Easterbrook, Kanne, Rovner, Williams, Sykes, Tinder, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kevin Harold v. Christopher SteelSeventh Circuit· 2014-12-11· cited 111×
- Janetos v. Fulton Friedman & Gullace, LLPSeventh Circuit· 2016-04-07· cited 103×
- Stratton v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCSixth Circuit· 2014-10-24· cited 95×
- John Burton v. Kohn Law Firm, S.C.Seventh Circuit· 2019-08-09· cited 80×
- United States v. All Funds on Deposit With R.J. O'Brien & AssociatesSeventh Circuit· 2015-04-02· cited 64×
- Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. Corp. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-06-16· cited 50×
- Michelle Gilbank v. Wood County Department of Human ServicesSeventh Circuit· 2024-08-01· cited 50×
- Mark Janus v. American Federation of StateSeventh Circuit· 2019-11-05· cited 44×
- Jackson v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.Seventh Circuit· 2016-08-17· cited 41×
- Brackeen v. HaalandFifth Circuit· 2021-04-06· cited 36×
- Portalatin v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2018-08-13· cited 27×
- Tia Robinson v. eCast Settlement CorporationSeventh Circuit· 2016-08-10· cited 22×
- U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Kraft Foods Group, Inc.N.D. Illinois· 2015-12-18· cited 20×
- Nichole L. Richards v. Par, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2020-03-25· cited 15×
- Oliva v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore LLCSeventh Circuit· 2017-07-24· cited 11×
- Portalatin v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLCN.D. Illinois· 2015-08-28· cited 10×
- In re Equalization Appeal of Walmart Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 2022-07-01· cited 9×
- Gillespie v. Blitt & Gaines, P.C.N.D. Illinois· 2015-07-23· cited 9×
- Oliva v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLCSeventh Circuit· 2016-06-14· cited 6×
- Oliva v. Blatt, Hasenmiller, Leibsker & Moore, LLCN.D. Illinois· 2015-07-14· cited 5×
Cites
53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 4,884×
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court· 1992-03-09· cited 3,104×
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,492×
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 1,372×
- Gregory v. AshcroftSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 1,325×
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-06-19· cited 1,301×
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court· 1993-06-18· cited 1,200×
- Felder v. CaseySupreme Court· 1988-06-22· cited 1,126×
- BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,012×
- Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 938×
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-06-27· cited 937×
- Sebelius v. CloerSupreme Court· 2013-05-20· cited 919×
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 876×
- James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 803×
- South Dakota v. DoleSupreme Court· 1987-06-23· cited 678×
- John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2008-01-08· cited 519×
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court· 1952-02-04· cited 512×
- Testa v. KattSupreme Court· 1947-03-10· cited 481×
- Bond v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2014-06-02· cited 374×
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1915-06-21· cited 359×
Other cases named Mark Suesz v. Med-1 Solutions, LLC
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.