· 8/9/2011
Strope v. Cummings
Citations
- 653 F.3d 1271
- 2011 WL 3455827
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting a court may revisit a plaintiff’s IFP status sua sponte
- “And although § 1915(g) is not jurisdictional . . ., we may raise the issue of strikes sua sponte.”
- “When a prisoner has accumulated three strikes, he has ‘struck out’ from proceeding IFP in a new civil action or appeal.”
- “[T]his court has ‘the discretion to revoke that [in forma pauperis] privilege when it no longer serves its goals.’”
- courts “may raise the issue of strikes sua sponte”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tymkovich, Baldock, Brorby
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.