Skip to main content
· 8/9/2011

Strope v. Cummings

Citations

  • 653 F.3d 1271
  • 2011 WL 3455827

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting a court may revisit a plaintiff’s IFP status sua sponte
  • “And although § 1915(g) is not jurisdictional . . ., we may raise the issue of strikes sua sponte.”
  • “When a prisoner has accumulated three strikes, he has ‘struck out’ from proceeding IFP in a new civil action or appeal.”
  • “[T]his court has ‘the discretion to revoke that [in forma pauperis] privilege when it no longer serves its goals.’”
  • courts “may raise the issue of strikes sua sponte”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tymkovich, Baldock, Brorby

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.