· 6/9/2017
Pavatt v. Royal
Citations
- 859 F.3d 920
- 2017 WL 2507984
- 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10319
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- summarily affirming district court’s finding that period of seven months, and ultimate pretrial detention of twelve months considering trial date, did not violate due process; see United States v. Ali, No. 11-cr-0106, 2011 WL 6748503, at (D.D.C. Dec. 21, 2011
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Briscoe, Hartz, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.